🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (11 tweets)

Moral objectivism is good for people not able to or who don’t care to wade through a meaning crisis into a more empty morality. So they find solace in rigidity. https://t.co/FapA5txwwX

maybe one day their norms even become the normie focal points https://t.co/EGjZpRGW6T

and the funny thing then is... when weirdos find each other, and do things that other weirdos find cool, next thing you know... now other people think it's cool, too by helping yourself, and by helping your friends, you rewrite reality. https://t.co/Za8jDQ3ohL


Morality vs (aesth)ethics https://t.co/Ex3dQlxcTy

coming to see “morality as aesthetics,” “morality as objective,” as just different spins we apply on morality, some of which align better with our psychologies than others, neither particularly “true”—they just are what they are, as stances https://t.co/PRvbrPAWin

though some encourage more looseness with the truth than others https://t.co/PAuiSrCJ9a

related: spend less time arguing about what should, share more what is https://t.co/gQxXocjncA

this is actually touching the felt senses and letting them update naturally (as they always ever do, unless subdued and strangled by higher conceptual points of overrides) https://t.co/vT9R3jD09x