π§΅ View Thread
π§΅ Thread (43 tweets)

I think Iβm revising my belief about determinism in a direction I donβt like, and this has been a source of unpleasantness and frustration for me. I think reality is more deterministic than I had wanted to believe. The good news is that itβs still very open-ended... I hope π

People can change, people can surprise you, unforeseen things happen all the time... yet(?) this is really more a function of the limits of our perception, our understanding and our models of reality. In a way our ignorance is a source of novelty and surprise

We βplay the cards weβre dealtβ, and βgo to war with the army we have, not the army we wish we hadβ - these are correct in the immediate present. But in the long game, if you can choose better cards, better players, etc, it makes sense to do so

walking away from a disagreement can be a more profound and substantial disagreement than having it. not always; often itβs shitty escapism or conflict avoidance. But also, not every fight has to be fought If you play a bigger/longer game you *will* be misinterpreted

@visakanv "Don't go to war if at all possible" is how it should go Any real self-defense does it that way. Play to win. And in an infinite game there are infinite potential moves. Your opponent cannot plan infinite defenses. If you're on the ropes; move to a new rope

@visakanv Do you have any rules/fences left at this point? Any fences you perceive but can't cross? https://t.co/CEhbuMZD2E I'm very lost r/n but I want to build the network as fast as is reasonable

@visakanv ok that's not true at all I want to go as fast as is POSSIBLE but that's why it is with good reason that it is not up to me https://t.co/THYnJGCIjq fallback: make good art until morale improves

@eddiephlash @ESYudkowsky No. EY thinks so too, which is why he considers that a non-aligned AI. I would consider that acceptably-aligned, because the remaining 6billion of us would get to live like god-kings, and on balance that's worth it. Don't let me design AGI until I can prove it's aligned.

@CountJ0ecool https://t.co/9w29m39pIa https://t.co/wxOAVmtvgG

@visakanv Fuck but I need to channel the manic pixie ADHD dream energy to build me one of those. I blame my tools, but the only one who's to blame here is my self. Twitter has been surprisingly close to semi-long shortform writing. Will find a better UI; I'm sure you have one in there

@visakanv bones said: Do the first two, the third will look unusual https://t.co/942OFmppnm


@CountJ0ecool https://t.co/9w29m39pIa https://t.co/wxOAVmtvgG

@visakanv Fuck but I need to channel the manic pixie ADHD dream energy to build me one of those. I blame my tools, but the only one who's to blame here is my self. Twitter has been surprisingly close to semi-long shortform writing. Will find a better UI; I'm sure you have one in there

@visakanv bones said: Do the first two, the third will look unusual https://t.co/942OFmppnm


@visakanv You are dealt the cards you have to work with, but the other Visas get dealt other cards, all possible combinations. So at least one of you has nothing to complain about. :-)

@dbabbitt @visakanv Now I observe that Visa is just fine without quantum metaphors. It might help him connect with people who speak physics marginally better, but the EVEN better way to do that is to point him at people who've already started to articulate things that way

@dbabbitt @visakanv This is the closest one I have on hand: https://t.co/M1NrPxxixY Cantide has more, though he's very fractal and less good at marketing than Visa, so you'll have to do some work to translate between the two. If you see anything interesting I can try to conduit as best I can

@dbabbitt @visakanv I'm not sure if we're friends in a non-metaphysical sense, but I grok he jive well enough to connect this dot to that one too https://t.co/p0eottIVSM Chaos isn't a ladder it's a NETWORK and WE ARE THE BRAIN

@dbabbitt @visakanv in case I die before I wake here's a little tip to take One way to frame this is that the universe is fractal and splitting because of many-worlds. In manyworlds, quantum suicide is a natural extrapolation from the premise https://t.co/fvo7GhhWzi

@quickdrawyall @maybegray Systemic thinking has tons of implicit information. Structure alone provides incredible amounts of data via generative processes. Given two data points I could give you 100 data points following one "simple" generative ruleset. Only 100 cause ppl dont let me keep going that long.

@dbabbitt @visakanv Meaning, if you observe yourself in universe-A, that's where you wound up. You could zig or za- ok it was zig, now conditioning on that basis Question: what does this does to the size of the OBSERVABLE universe?

@dbabbitt @visakanv question: what is outside of the observable universe? Define observable. Light cone extruded from a reference frame. Implication: by including the future, we have a space of all possible universes reachable from a pre-existing point

@dbabbitt @visakanv Answer: of course! What happens when two adjacent light cones more forward in t, and begin to intersect? mOther fUcking MiRaClEs ok but seriously this is where my understanding of the physics breaks down, phone a friend. @Cantide1 ? I have prepared the altar now I summon thee

@CountJ0ecool @visakanv What is your take on crushing the universe? Something like quantum-tunneling in anti-baryons from the many-worlds, driving down the magnitude of Higgs field to produce a negative cosmological constant, allowing us to use gravitational shear as an energy source, etc.

@dbabbitt @visakanv my lightcone is getting real narrow rn so I have to go be mysterious elsewhere stay curious my friend I will get back to you when I can continue the work be voracious and learn all you can be ready for when the dawn breaks