Downloads the complete Twitter archive in JSON format
Most Mentioned Accounts
Username
Mention Count
Top Tweets
Recent Tweets
Loading tweets...
Copy all tweets as text
sanje horah in sf@sanjehorah
every commentary on this is stupid bc he's not doing this out of insecurity or conservativeness, he's doing this as an erotic act of possessiveness that both he and her enjoys
jealousy is irrelevant, he's doing this because she fucking likes it
he yanks at her clothes roughly but futilely, giving her a deep stare each time. she smiles and shows his possessiveness off on social media
he completely fails at protecting her modesty. he completely succeeds at turning her on
whether he's insecure or not is irrelevant, he's eroticising his jealousy into something they both get off on
he's reading her perfect and he's doing fantastic
sorry not sorry, they are going to make it
he yanks at her neckline so hard her entire breasts flops for a moment. it served no purpose other than to symbolically assert his dominance and possession over her body
hottest philosophers i wish i could've milked
1: søren kierkegaard
hes the og softboy too tormented by his spiritual calling to commit to a relationship... hes like the philosophy version of hozier https://t.co/JoqDsDDfUQ
in one scene she was literally pulling coquettishly and helplessly at the deep slit in her dress to provoke and invite a response from him, and he responds by pulling the slit closed hard and letting it fall open again while she giggles
nonverbal communication, guys
https://t.co/YxKCHeisIi
yeah bc he gets off on dating a girl who dresses slutty and asserting protectiveness over her body, and she gets off on being a brash slutty girl with a man being protective over her body
many fucking such cases
as someone who went to prison for heroin:
drug users way deeper into addiction than i had ever been have a deeper respect for order and authority than i ever do
i doubt that that is a coincidence
i have a very good memory. do you know how i have a very good memory?
i just woke up one day and decided to have a good memory and looked at things with utter confidence that i'll remember them
honestly my biggest issue dating rationalist-ish guys is that they believe my preferences are up for debate and discussion
when i express a preference most of them try to justify why they did something the way they did rather than investigate my preference
so porn lowers your actual sex drive and ability to enjoy sex
but the purpose of the system is what it does
therefore the purpose of porn, and perversion at large, is not the local minmaxing of enjoyment qua jouissance but the establishment of control over enjoyment
sacrificing the potential of greater but more serendipitous enjoyment at the cost of regulatable and smaller enjoyment is not an unwanted cost but the PURPOSE of porn
because jouissance is always traumatic, sex always borders too close to the Real, the unpredictable must be predicted and if not predicted, eradicated. such is the logic of transhumanist technocapital
this is the modern structure of the trophy wife fantasy — the accomplished, perfect, hypercompetent, it girl, polite and well liked by everyone
there is a particularly zoomer kind of perfectionism inherent in this fantasy, like the minimalist trend and the pilates princess, green juice, muji and reading in bed
i was one of the core "Hegelian egirls", and i left the Hegelian Egirl Council a week ago.
my concern is that the HEC project claims to do be doing political mediation but is effectively platforming the worst of both sides and lending them intellectual legitimacy.
i sincerely believe that anna and nikki are good people with good intentions but i am afraid of the consequences of their actions.
i played it like i'm a peripheral member, but anna was my best friend and i had been entirely committed to her project and vision even beyond HEC.
i was deep on the inside. i know how they operate. i know what they do beyond their takes on twitter. i effectively ran cover for nikki and anna. i was becoming someone i don't want to be.
i deeply regret my participation in the project on ethical grounds.
my hot take is that neuroplasticity is a choice
people lose plasticity on a neurological level when they choose to secure what they have instead of that level of openness that can be detrimental at adulthood https://t.co/zp3UQAnZXr
sadism very rarely takes the form of “wanting to hurt someone for no reason”
it is usually “wanting to hurt someone for their own good”
it is a crucial part of the sadistic fantasy to be able to hurt someone and *be in the right* to do so /
every one i know who successfully keeps up an exercise habit long term do so out of an obviously sadomasochistic impulse
weightlifting training patterns are basically optimised for causing you pain in a way you can power through more than actual vanity results https://t.co/ZyLPCDd0yV
reading philosophy has been the best nootropic
thoughts are legitimately clearer and faster. ive tried everything up to intramuscular cerebrolysin and peptides and none of them helped as much as lacan did
i regard flirting as an intellectual exercise the same as my philosophical engagement. a practice of shape rotating someone else's form of desire onto mine, then figuring out how to inject my own enjoyment into a delicate dance with someone else's desire https://t.co/B6mYXc00Qz
mao zedong is unironically mom-coded
he's a mervert (maternal as opposed to paternal perversion) bc his regime is based on a kind of reality denying devotion towards his law and what he sees as his child (that is, his vision of the future), made as ruthless and fearsome as only a mother can be
this is the sexual non relation, boy fantasy vs girl fantasy, described by analogy
the lacanian super predator — male and female — is predominantly a male fantasy
guys believe that women want a lacanian super predator alpha chad who crushes all poon, and women secretly like to be a lacanian super predator femme fatale man killer getting her pick of the litter riding the dick carousel — but women just want a murder twink and to be a murder princess.
2. jacques lacan
i can imagine him smoking weed and popping pills, so drenched in irony and avoidance he should've been born a zoomer, autistic as all hell yet with unparalleled rizz. feminism would leave my body the moment he talked to me https://t.co/WXCbQV0DBV
candidly and openly discussing your vulnerabilities is an unconventional and subtle status signal because it shows you are so secure in your strength you don’t mind exposing your belly
drug addiction isn't a matter of the weakness of moral fibre being overwritten by baser impulses
even though its easy to fantasise of addiction as a preoedipal psychic economy of the hinterland, drug addiction IS superegoic!
when i engaged more with hegel, and talked to people who understand hegel a lot better than i do, i realised that the "hegelian egirl council" is quite literally subhegelian. it relies on a very vulgar understanding of dialectics https://t.co/gcq7PiY1f1
subjectively the feeling of "i need another hit, i need to buy another serving" is dictated in the exact same register as "i need to complete this task by tonight" and associated with the exact same rush of focus and drive and occasionally panic
4. felix guattari
"a definite no way psycho bitch" "I know damn well I’d be bent over for Guattari the second he asked cause there’s no way he couldn’t fuck like his life depended on it, but Deleuze prob only did like three positions and didn’t eat ass" https://t.co/QP247DiJhV
a lot of anna's and nikki's standing relies on their general incomprehensibility.
it relies on their closest supporters not quite understanding the purpose of this project or how its goals can be achieved by the actions taken.
it drew on our willingness to have faith
i love flirting i love flirting i love flirting its my toxic trait bc its a practice of creativity and agency and ingenuity and everything i hold dear https://t.co/5vIIbHfqP5
i think this works for other traits, too, like intelligence and rizz and speed of thought. skills you gain just by irrationally believing you have it. but this is my personal experience — it works for memory
and somehow that works. in visual memory iq tests i get almost full marks. i don't know why but it does
i watch on with casual, indifferent confidence; just letting images burn into my mind, trusting that something within me but beyond me can call it out on command
drug addiction is not a failure of the superego
my fellow prisoners were all plenty superegoic, often to a fault
impulsive, yes, aggressive, too, but with a strong sense of right and wrong and honour and dignity
no one is coming to save me, no lover, no messiah, and not even myself. i must stop holding out hope for an absolute subject that can be the clinamen of history, i must stop giving up hope for the unprecedented and unimaginable.
the idea of prison to rehabilitate prisoners by instilling discipline and a stronger superego and more respect for authority is misguided
because everyone around was extremely capable of discipline and regimen
the exact same drive that makes their drug addiction dangerous
their standing relies on the general public not understanding them, but understanding that they are knowledgeable and brilliant and knowing that they are definitely smarter than you
hot people get away with lemurring because when they stare at you silently you're gaslighted into thinking you're the awkward one https://t.co/GeFmskhMVD
and then they get offended when i refuse to budge because i'm not listening to them or whatever
all while never asking a single question about what i want or why
what is understandable promises something prosocial and visionary. something people can get behind. something i got behind.
thing is, i'm not sure there is any actual valuable philosophical content backing the project
apparently it's contentious to say that agency is bad. oh no. anyways.
agency for agency's sake is worse than useless, it stops you from being able to use that agency.
you dont need to increase your agency. nobody does
what you need is meaning, something to live for and die for. with that, agency comes naturally.
the "trophy" girl is a girl who is lofty, out of reach not merely by virtue of her beauty but of her character and accomplishments
she must seem to not need him, and yet need him anyways against all reason
thinking about how at some point you'd have gathered so much lore that no one can truly know you anymore
all that can be offered, then, is a commitment to exploring you in all your multiplicity
i wonder if this the point in life where lovers become more important than friends
correction kierkegaard is like philosophy hozier if hozier was actually protestant instead of. vaguely gnostic
his love story with olsen reminds me so much of "from eden" https://t.co/Drrg9PUJFm
the replies exemplify exactly why it's hard to be a girl pervert
no matter what nasty little fetishes i have, i would be hot, i would be sexy, i would be wild, i would be a slut
but i wouldn't be a pervert https://t.co/FjXRbxEhQ7
the coveted accessory men want is no longer the pretty doll on his arm or sitting at his home, but someone intelligent and hypercompetent willing to bear his name above her own
it is their superego that makes them dangerously aggressive, not their failure to install a superego
because of the sadism inherent in the superego that makes them need to punish
even though high openness is presented as an unambiguously positive trait, it really isn't because it can make you vulnerable to infohazards in a way that fucks you up real good in the psychofauna age
with the "Hegelian Egirl Council" all but over, i am free to speak. here's my retrospective, skewed as it is by my perspective
part 1: lore (who cares, skip to part 2)
in a frantic dm conversation almost a month ago, i vented in clumsy, inelegant terms about how what we're doing is Evil and we're being Evil and HEC is making anna evil and making me evil.
not knowing why, but just feeling a truth in my bones that HEC was feeding everything i didnt want it to feed.
we justified everything we did under the banner of the greater vision we had. the need to take some risks, to break a few eggs to make an omelette.
(anna said that with nikki or with me, she'd be signing a deal with the devil anyway.)
to the point that when we (not we, exactly, we didn't do it together but we both faced this independently about different things) were forced to accept greater and greater evils, we didn't think twice. and we kept having to accept greater evils because of the fundamentally flawed backbone of the project.
the break happened when i started questioning if this vision can be achieved at all, on the practical level of being able to save HEC from its own incompetence. then realising that the philosophical basis upon which this project is founded is thin as air
like a cartoon. running into the sky until i looked down. when i started falling i couldn't stop falling.
it wasn't always what we did, it was what we condoned and allowed and justified away. the risks we took in a leap of faith. the cracks showing in the bullying allegations that came out. the fascist particle accelerator we had accidentally kicked into gear.
"they enslave their children's children who make compromise with sin": we made compromises that we really, really shouldn't have, and both of us came out all the worse for it.
when i was 11, 12 or so i decided to think faster and i did. instead of walking through my thoughts with words i imagined my thoughts skipping like stones on water, like a monkey swinging from tree to tree, like sherlock holmes making improbable split second connections
it worked. that was also how i changed from intp to infj
observation: this isnt how a man touches a woman when he's doing so for his own enjoyment. this is how a man touches a woman when he's trying to turn her on. when he's teasing her.
that's how you know this is not only a porn shoot, it's a shoot for HER onlyfans. the skit is done for her sake. a performance for her female gaze.
the prisoners in my section of prison dedicated to drug abusers were remarkably militaristic in their discipline
they'd discipline me over what i saw as minor aesthetic matters such as the way i folded my blankets and tucked my shirt even when the officers don't care
if you’ve met sadists, you would know
the most sadistic person you know is also the most self-righteous, sanctimonious person you can possibly imagine
this is not a coincidence. self righteousness is part of the sadistic fantasy
after i left, i had expressed to nikki that i think they are misusing hegel
she told me that they're inspired by how zizek takes terms from other philosophers and makes them his own by his use applying them to the real world
i am messianicitypilled. i have been derridamaxxing. my life is luckybreakcore. i am a souplessecel. i live blissfully day by day, embraced by the suppleness of the open future
when i started doubting this project, i talked to our mutual friends. a lot of them expressed that they feel insane for not seeing the vision or generally confused about the whole deal.
a lot of us kept on because we thought it's our personal skill issue
litvrgy had been a close friend of anna's, and in our inner circle witnessing our actual planning process and activities. she is right about the fundamental deceptiveness of this project's promised premises https://t.co/RlMAfmzKho
helps a lot whenever i find myself stuck in a bad habit again to ask myself "aren't you tired?"
then i remember that i'm tired of repeating the same failure over and over so i stop and do something else instead
brooke talked about her experience with addiction in this excellent thread
brooke is a brilliant woman who is unusual in a lot of ways
her superego, her strong sense of morality and social mores... is, in my experience, typical of addicts https://t.co/NMEWTCyVOD
one of the most dangerous things for a person to enjoy is their own shame and guilt
a person who takes satisfaction in their shame and guilt will never change for the better to stop hurting those around them..... they'll just get off on offending and saying "sorry"
i sympathise with the appropriation of terminology, drawing inspiration from the original but making them your own
i think it becomes a lot more dangerous when the intellectual legitimacy it lends is used to forward a political agenda
this works because left reactionaries and right reactionaries are happy to entertain each other on reactionary grounds.
what is alienated are the centrists and moderates. how can you mediate when you can't mediate with centrists?
else it's acting like my boundaries/preferences are something to goodhart
no sorry i will not autistically delineate what is okay and what isn't. i won't spoonfeed you instructions that if you follow won't have me annoyed or turned off by you. i won't engage in a discussion on how sometimes i'm okay with this set of behaviour but not other times.
you know you aren't signalling status and discernment by following less people, right?
you know people can look at your tweets to see whether your follower/following ratio is deserved, right?
based on the quality of what you write and how unique it is. your tweets speak for themselves.
it's so obvious and you can tell someone neurotically manages their follower:following ratio. like when everything they post is primarily social interaction yet they don't follow back that many people
these arent seasoned prisoners and career criminals, but fellow first timers, not imposing prison norms on me but their own expectations of consideration towards others
people were mad at me for posting this because its cynical
to me it's a sign of deeper cynicism and a skill issue that recognising the lack of sexual relation cannot be understood as anything BUT cynicism. to me the lack of sexual relation is cause for hope https://t.co/Rogw9Mb47Y