🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (40 tweets)

Found some classics in social behavior analysis theories. Seems like my valuation for paperbooks is about $0.50 https://t.co/eOS82wplDW


Found an overview of his works:https://t.co/aeqBHHiZk7+ A Khan Academy that covers the "Functionalism" Offshoot https://t.co/ql8UIMuXtz

I was going to try playing Terraria, but now sucked in:"for someone else, it could be home to spiders and ants" https://t.co/h5W7RfZYWu

While there's valid criticisms, I'm a big fan of Berne's ideas as a stepping stone toward theory of mind. Overview:https://t.co/D8FTeUYL1M https://t.co/27Qb4u3v8u


Led me to books that helped me understand how much perspective / life trajectory mattered thru a lense of language.https://t.co/JUCCT664UA https://t.co/6qmONbGOIa


More recently, reading Pinker's work on language [https://t.co/AFGq3gRXOu] lead me to exploring cultural effect on what we learn/focus on.

IMHO, a failure of early psychology is rooted in heavy focus of parent-child relationships & bias of Freudian lens. https://t.co/cSRreIUOnh

Most of our schooling & medical categories seem to place divergence under a negative light, if considered at all: https://t.co/yMgIq2Rm7L

Its fascinating to think how society could be structured differently to help these groups thrive, and why it hasn't. https://t.co/1sGIaNYU2Q

Or specifically, why it isn't evenly spread. Perhaps a mix of genetics https://t.co/FYz4KjDdbn and various cultures?https://t.co/mxHeQuAhXA

IMHO, thing missing in many studies is the complex feedback loops between genes, culture, and resources/environment: https://t.co/5h9wptJSzD

What's rude in one roll is perfectly fine in another. I struggle with similar spreads in cultures: https://t.co/oTT3q6pRWp (I'm ask/tell).

That there's more than one successful strategy at a cultural level suggests why there's more spread than expected: https://t.co/J1aRYUa59o

Arragements of people fall along this 3x3x3 in clusters would have different success depending on environment. https://t.co/yxIRlXQai4

This 3x3x3 help me combine stuff like https://t.co/jP8xRZfp8I and https://t.co/YlpKBlI3gp as competing groups moving thru interaction space.

It also suggests a predator-prey like population dynamic, where stability is in fluctuation.https://t.co/3iMw0fxHH9

Imagining it like https://t.co/M6T8pX7kPU in 3d w/ groups diverging like metaballs/lava lamps; A mashup of Conflict theory + Functionalism

The people who are more rigid/independently minded end up shifting more slowly between the metaballs, acting like https://t.co/OgwSy0HmkX

And this ends up being meta-stable foraging patterns, like Robert Sapolsky's https://t.co/awKA2ROTUB and https://t.co/91hwp33qmi

We all have capacities, but initial wiring of attention predisposes us one way or another, brain level cast system? https://t.co/Cf1SwajtMO

Another set of three worth considering: true/necessary/kindSeems like an expansion of the golden rule. https://t.co/y9IASz0Ksc

Mashup these various archetypes together and you end up seeing meta patterns like this great observation here: https://t.co/uTvwrGlkgm

Operating Theory:The social-cultural ratcheting effect needs diversity of ideas to forage effectively.https://t.co/5biHfzTD7B

Or rather, if it applies in brains, why not in groups? https://t.co/n2vqPQNM6z

"in […] collaborative contexts individuals with less complex social cognition would be protected from exploitation"https://t.co/fcFSA5va9o https://t.co/KMrExOKfIa
