Community Archive

🧵 View Thread

🧵 Thread (22 tweets)

Placeholder
QC@QiaochuYuan5 months ago

this is pure typical mind fallacy. antinatalists are people who are deeply, wildly unhappy and projecting that onto everybody else including future people who don't even exist yet. i'm grateful to be alive and even on my darkest days i knew i'd be grateful to be alive eventually

1.1K 63
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Eric Jorgenson 📚 ☀️@EricJorgenson5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Bring back mental institutions

2 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
sedate snail@sedatesnail5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan I was so frustrated to read Benatar bc I wanted him to have a compelling/interesting argument. but he didn't! he just started with "the bad parts of life are worse than the good" as an axiom! if I wrote that as a college philosophy essay, I oughta flunk!

27 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
QC@QiaochuYuan5 months ago
Replying to @sedatesnail

@sedatesnail lol. lmao, even

5 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Andrew Quinn@hiAndrewQuinn5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Oh, I read his book some year ago. To Benatar's credit, he does put forward an actual kinda-metaphysical argument in there - something about an asymmetry between how it's not good to do good things for people that don't exist yet, but it is bad to do bad things to them or smth

10 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
nicole@bibliographing5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Anti-natalists don’t necessarily project that onto everyone else, and Benatar specifically does not. As summarized here: https://t.co/ZUXhJfhp6V

Tweet image 1
1 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
mtoq is lean between 1 and 11000@GchTrivs5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Seems evasive and dismissive. It's not just an appeal to emotion, Benatar has actual arguments for his position.

2 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
luke111111@luke11111135 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan I dont like how that article shares a photograph of him despite him saying within the article he wouldn't want that. Vaguely reminiscent of the SSC debacle.

1 1
5/12/2025
Placeholder
“At once!” ass post@chalantsaffron5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan People can be antinatalist personally, it’s when they ascribe it to others, esp in the extreme, that it becomes a problem. Most people are natal standardists, that agree with the idea that certain standards of living should be met before having children, esp many, is considered.

1 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Yup yup yup@Hi_individual15 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan They want you to feel as bad as they do cuz misery loves company

1 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
QualiaNerd@QualiaNerd5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

That’s not true. Your personal hedonic setpoint can be high and you can still recognize the grim reality of the rather low hedonic setpoint of the biosphere at large. Granted - people usually instinctively extrapolate from their experience and don’t do complex system 2 reasoning, so you are more likely to see a depressed anti-natalist than a hyperthymic one, but it is perfectly possible to be the latter.

14 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Arataki@aaarataki5 months ago
Replying to @QualiaNerd

@QualiaNerd @QiaochuYuan i feel wildly lucky to match this description perfectly -- very high hedonic setpoint without being biased against recognizing the problem of natural suffering & its disvalue

5 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
QualiaNerd@QualiaNerd5 months ago
Replying to @aaarataki

@aaarataki @QiaochuYuan Excellent.

1 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
sang froid@sang___froid5 months ago
Replying to @QualiaNerd

@QualiaNerd @QiaochuYuan Theoretically possible, according to your theory, but yet to be empirically observed

0 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
tsdrone@enordst5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan I read you loud’n clear. We should euthanize anti-natalists. New cause area, even—stone two birds with one kill, as they say.

0 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
argon@ArgonGruber5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Is it a fallacy? Or is Benatar drawing a valid inference from a false premise?

0 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
argon@ArgonGruber5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan This argument “Life is pain. Therefore, we should stop having kids” is fallacious. It commits the non sequitur fallacy. The conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises.

0 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Floidberg@floidberg5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

he sucks unbelievable amounts of everything. it's a pure weasel move, milk depression for endless attention and sympathy, philosophizing an affectual problem. it's managing to be too much of a coward to be a pro mortalist and also too much of a coward to make life better. and the worst part is it captures neurotics to make them feel better about their own cowardice. writing that book did more to add suffering to the world than having children and getting over himself. certainly more than never writing it

2 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Jakethecrazy🦬@Jakethecrazy195 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan This leads to the obvious question Why doesn’t the author just take their own life then?

0 0
5/12/2025
Placeholder
Shouting into the Void@birth_of_state5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan Suicide is literally so easy and can be done so painlessly, I really don't think anti-natalists have a leg to stand on.

1 0
5/13/2025
Placeholder
𝔬𝔭𝔱𝔦𝔪𝔶𝔰𝔱𝔦𝔠🧙‍♂️@optimysticism5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan sucks that this guy gets given a massive platform every couple of years

0 0
5/13/2025
Placeholder
JayS@kureshii_5 months ago
Replying to @QiaochuYuan

@QiaochuYuan "Life is so painful" is a feeling not a belief, this is an ontological miscategorization

0 0
5/13/2025