Sythdark8 E/ACK@synthdark8• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot But then you'd have to fight the environmental lobby truth and nail. Turns out they actually hate any solution that works.

Harry “Supercilious” Swan@HarryClov3r• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot YOOOOUUUU CANNNNN TRRRRRRYYYYYYY!!!!!

Wallace Bear Saban@bammerforceone• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Don't you face jail time for looking at them wrong?

Alan Konig@AlanKonig• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Yes, but that would actually result in *more* reliable power generation, and that's not what progressives want.

Smooth Crab@NotSoSmolBirb• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot At this point the only hope for a natural nuclear reactor to spontaneously emerge like at Oklo.

¡Jeb!@jeb_bush_2028• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot environmentalists would much rather destroy the environment than use nuclear energy

Aimless Walker@yuureisen_king• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot And irrigate the Joshua trees with the nuclear waste water, to get carbon sequestering monsters? Pure genius I would've expected no less

Maria@mariaforx• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot No

bubbling creek@bubbling_creek• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot There are at least 4 million of these trees in CA. Also solar costs have dropped like a rock over the past decade, even if nuclear was deregulated solar would still be very competitive imo, so this is reasonable, it's a desert lol

Moro Rogers@trackpadfollies• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Maybe I'd prefer a nuclear plant but there are a lot of Joshua trees.

pantsdailyon@pantsdailyon• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Smaller footprint. Fewer dead trees. Win/win

Cat O’ Nine Tales 🌺 🔫@NineCato• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot @Nitetrain_1 Exactly.

Tim Babb@tr_babb• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot hundreds of square miles of solar is damage to the environment, we forget much less damage (and less permanent) than carbon emission + oil + gas mining. but still something

artworkanonymous 🪐@artworkanonymo1• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot My buddy is setting up a spot to propagate those plants. His whole yard is an exotic cacti garden. It’s amazing.

James Edmonds@J3K420• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot or hear me out here, use the wood from the trees to make windmills

Zarren364@Zarren364• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot The mileage I get out of this gif. https://t.co/7OjBwUJ3tT

ᴱᵁᴳᴱᴺᴱ ɪᴘᴀᴠᴇᴄ@EugeneIpavec• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot This isn't funny. Fash scum only pretend to care about the environment when they're severely distressed

E_III_R 🚀@E_III_R• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Yes, they could also just put fewer solar panels leaving gaps around the trees That is literally the joy of solar, you can adapt it to where you want to put it and make it the size you want

Lance Vader@LanceVader• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot I've been to Boron. This is about the only thing that could make that land uglier. But they do have a lot of sun. Way more than what they need.

Tristan Cunha@cunha_tristan• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot If they have the option to do either, why aren't they just building the nuclear plant instead?

The Antagonist@The1Antagonist• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Well no, that would be useful and effective

magusgenji@MagusGenji• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot You can't save the trees with nuclear!

Hedonism Bot@HedonismBot17• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot It's good when we do it

Thor Thunderdog@ThorThunderdog• over 1 year ago

Replying to @eigenrobot

@eigenrobot Tree might be in the way of that too.