Community Archive

🧡 View Thread

🧡 Thread (4 tweets)

Placeholder
Danielle Fong ξ¨€πŸ”†@DanielleFongβ€’ about 2 years ago

in my humble opinion this is v strong evidence that there is something; it’s not like people come up with high temperature super conductors randomly, hard to fake. finding a superconducting effect at any temp in an insulator is a strong sign, but, making it high quality enough to be room temperature is another great leap. iirc, the original authors made 8000 samples (correct me if i’m wrong @altryne) and achieved success <10% of the time. lots of room to improve quality and yield

2.1K 154
8/2/2023
Placeholder
Danielle Fong ξ¨€πŸ”†@DanielleFongβ€’ about 2 years ago
Replying to @DanielleFong

as @sdamico points out 110K is on the high end of existing high temperature superconductors. it’s remarkable that they found this, and it makes sense that the critical temperature could be much lower if less pure. early days of reproduction, really! https://t.co/VQd1ijiStQ

Tweet image 1
413 14
8/2/2023
Placeholder
Danielle Fong ξ¨€πŸ”†@DanielleFongβ€’ about 2 years ago
Replying to @DanielleFong

@sdamico log resistance plot https://t.co/MNPbqz3tgc

Tweet image 1
11 0
8/3/2023
Placeholder
Danielle Fong ξ¨€πŸ”†@DanielleFongβ€’ about 2 years ago
Replying to @DanielleFong

@sdamico lots of concern out of people looking at the linear plot. maybe someone can help me, because https://t.co/OXEW2CSvM5

Placeholder
Danielle Fong ξ¨€πŸ”†@DanielleFongβ€’ about 2 years ago

@uberstaking @sdamico i don’t understand, at all, why you would use a linear plot to see this. the 250K transition is a mystery but i makes the actual transition too difficult to see. it goes much lower than the 250K section. the log plot is more useful for everything afaik

4 0
12 1
8/3/2023