🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (35 tweets)

in any group conflict, there are perceived to be two parties-- the aggressor and the v̶i̶c̶t̶i̶m̶ person who starts the drama this is because if the victim just rolls over and takes it, *there is no conflict to be seen*

victim: idk, maybe it wasnt a big deal and they didnt mean to hurt me but i feel really bad about it? i dont know what to do meanwhile, aggressor (or people siding with them): victim is garbage, i can't believe they would do this, i am obviously correct

when i cant get convincing information, this is how i decide who's the one that actually needs protecting (some aggressors use standard victim wording, but i havent encountered anyone who, afaict!!, was clever enough to do it convincingly--their ego usually shows)

there are two likely outcomes from here on out the victim gets booted (possibly taking one or two close allies with them) or the victim rolls over and eats shit and is ~forbidden from ever bringing this up again but at least they get to stay in their "friend" group

i think the speech patterns to look for here stem from the fact that the aggressor is acting on ego, trying to maintain their image, while the victim is a conflicted mess and trying not to step on any toes and is often reluctant to point fingers https://t.co/9i8aI484iL

victim: idk, maybe it wasnt a big deal and they didnt mean to hurt me but i feel really bad about it? i dont know what to do meanwhile, aggressor (or people siding with them): victim is garbage, i can't believe they would do this, i am obviously correct


ofc this leaves the question of how to handle it, which admittedly can be complicated, especially if you care about group cohesion (which imo shouldnt be a priority) https://t.co/ghZ02OsYaQ

there are two likely outcomes from here on out the victim gets booted (possibly taking one or two close allies with them) or the victim rolls over and eats shit and is ~forbidden from ever bringing this up again but at least they get to stay in their "friend" group

ideally the aggressor realizes that their bullshit wont be tolerated and comes around and was just heated and doesnt behave like this as a rule and makes it up to the victim and everyone is fine (imo this wont happen if there are zero social consequences if they *dont*)

the sort of social consequences i'm thinking of here-- if there's a stalemate, the group probably has to play "child of divorced parents" until it reaches a new equilibrium? usually what i see if the victim sticks around is the group carries on as usual and the victim--


i wonder how much of this comes from the victim not having good boundaries and not knowing how to deal with 1:1 conflict? but i expect it plays out the same way in cases where they talk to the aggressor and the aggressor isnt interested in peacemaking



related!! https://t.co/Ly39Evx1ui

letting people save face is super important for resolving tensions-- https://t.co/NnUiueP9a2