🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (16 tweets)

it reminds me of this half-sprawling essays, that never properly begin their half-hearted entry into a domain of discourse https://t.co/TGfRBGXNf1

what is the real here? that is the question for this digital garden to answer for twitter, the real was - friends - replies - scenes of discourse - being witnessed https://t.co/MEJais7gkU

One year later: It got me a scene, friends, relationships, mentors, most of my leading-edge ideas, a base of people ready help, work with, and love me, a base of work I can point people to and build on for the rest of my life. I was languishing before, I have to admit it.

i just wanted to share this little mini-essay with my phenomenology reading group https://t.co/fgJcybA3Fg

i didn’t want to write it on twitter; the formatting felt confining i could have put it up on my https://t.co/cG2YyzpPtT blog. but obsidian felt nicer. my tools and formatting were there. i could connect it and link to other mini-essays easily

noticing something here— when i wanted to write note on phenomenology, i did so in the context of something real: wanting to share it with a group that made it worthwhile, it imposed a norm on it, it made presenting it narratively make sense https://t.co/gmPkp8mseV

so here’s the rule: - feel free to write notes in my digital garden - but if do, do it either with the idea in mind of sharing it with a specific person, or with sharing it to twitter immediately this creates that audience and a sense of participation in the real

it avoid the crazy-making of https://t.co/gmPkp8mseV

“put out things to whatever degree you have the time for” having an idea of “sharing it with X” (even if it’s sharing with twitter afterward) offers that sense of working in the real https://t.co/y4TRxok1t2

this is maybe too abstract of a connection, but: “isolation is the meta-danger of all dangers” without feedback in the world, things become increaingly unhinged and neurotic https://t.co/ykeFBOYenc
