Community Archive

🧵 View Thread

🧵 Thread (20 tweets)

Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago

You have solved a problem when you stop thinking about it.

16 3
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

In some ways, the problem wasn’t the problem itself—it was caring about it. To eliminate the sense of worrying about it, is the solve. The rest is cope.

11 2
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

To illustrate the difference between a cope and a solve: Strategy is cope. You’re trying to optimise something. Honour is a solve. Because when you have honour, you don’t *think about strategy* anymore. You’ve transcended it. https://t.co/FOqXNQXYeu https://t.co/zIK4L3MMJp

Tweet image 1
10 3
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

Your mind is spotless and clean. It doesn’t occur to an honourable person to strategise. They’re forgotten the frame in which it was a problem. They have transcended it. They have eliminated all sense of agency around it.

4 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

Productivity is about optimising energy. But to a person with unbridled energy, they just . . 𝘥𝘰. Telling them how to optimise their energy or do pomodors doesn’t make sense to them.

5 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

To someone who is content, they just 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦. You’d have to explain what a spiritual problem was for them to understand. “Ahhh, okay, so it’s like . . it’s a problem that . . ” When you have to have the problem explained to you, you have a solve.

5 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

Nihilism is a cope. Because you’re thinking about meaninglessness. Beauty is a solve, because when you cultivate beauty, meaninglessness doesn’t occur to you anymore. In a sense, you have ‘forgotten’ about it.

3 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

People who have solved problems this way seem to have forgotten the problem or have no conception of it. It’s almost a struggle to reconceptualise it from the frame in which it was a problem.

3 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

All this, because 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮, to optimise against it—it is still acknowledging the problem is real. That there is some issue:

2 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

- limited energy reserves, which you must spend, and apologise for not spending better - the impotence to just get what you want, hence you strategise - a spiritual issue; it occurs to you, the world is off somehow, so you philosophise

5 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

The solve to a problem isn’t the 𝘰𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘭 solution to it. It’s the unasking of it.

8 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

A frame from which it doesn’t make sense. To still be concerned about whether it is optimal is to still have the problem. You might be trying to approximate the solve version of it with your cope.

3 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

- Productivity people live as if they had unbridled energy / try to get there. - Spiritual people attempt to not care, in an attempt to look “maximally spiritual” (i.e., not care about it at all). - Strategy people read Thomas Schelling and cultivate honour.

3 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

These are not bad things. These people coping are approaching ever-more optimal responses to their problem. That is good. It’s also different from a solve.

3 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

The reason people coping usually don’t get to a solve, even when they try to increasingly approximate it, is because a solve usually requires a value set change. Whereas copers stick to their values and try to solve it by somehow just getting good at it.

4 2
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

They think with good enough tactics/strategy, they can get there, but no—they will just be optimising better Fwiw, this is often a good thing. If you really care about a value, like productivity, getting good at optimising it really does help you in the real world along its axis

3 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

So to summarise: - to cope is to optimise against a problem - to solve is to not have it make sense in your frame anymore

6 4
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

This is probably a good point to mention: The optimal amount of cope is not zero. Gosh—you would hope not, because some problems are worth optimising.

3 0
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

Being spotless mind, blank slate, perfect embodied no thinky no problem is great, and also it’s not what could have single-handedly built the world we live in. Problems come from *values*, and if those values serve you, you are meant to keep them, and optimise/struggle away.

4 1
8/11/2021
Placeholder
yatharth ༺༒༻@AskYatharthabout 4 years ago
Replying to @AskYatharth

And if you can—for the 5% of problems in your life you don’t care about this way—you can execute a value set change and unperceive them. You can dissolve perceived problems it really doesn’t serve you to be perceiving anymore. Happy spotless sexy mind.

7 0
8/11/2021