🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (18 tweets)

No system of morality is ethical. (and this is fine) https://t.co/z79qAFOnKL

Humans need form, because they need a legible, systemically shared and enforceable set of norms to carry out social functions—that’s what morality is. Ethics is more discriminating. https://t.co/zOSBWYgXXP

Ethics is more discriminating because it can be. It’s an individual thing. It’s not trying to, and could not historically do the same thing as morality, and we can’t hold it against morality the constraints its working with.

They’re scared if they let you go around spouting this truth, the action associated with that truth becomes endorsed too, and that’s dangerous. This is a legit fear to have, because to utter a truth is not neutral—it is a move in a language game. https://t.co/eGIQMsWvQy

Tantra will tell you the truth. That’s its approach. To go to the truth and through it, into what must be done once you know it. Dzogchen will tell you the truth. They will work with uttermost emptiness, and find nuance among it. https://t.co/Q6opuiUR2F

Dojos literally have explicit belts. You get punched in the face if you’re sorted wrong. They’re not afraid of inequality. Tantra isn’t either. It could tell me the blindlingly obvious truth, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭, while maintaining the emptiness of that too. https://t.co/5yAjUudFX3


Example: consent. High tantric consent is recognising consent ≠ yes, consent is not even anything necessarily conscious. It’s something else entirely. https://t.co/pL2FoN2oNa

You get enough exploitation in (most famously Western) tantric communities as it is, and that’s *with* all their specifically adapted social technologies like vows and cultural memory to deal with the specific dangers of tantric ethics.

I wanted to be told the truth, and so I searched for the postrats, and found tantra, and work with that. It was an individual choice born of my individual needs. https://t.co/36h0ltDlyu

Alternate forms, feel into both how an action would be right and how it would be wrong. You’ll find both sides have a rightness and wrongness to them. Both really often do have a right and nuanced rightness to discover. https://t.co/a8WzFzDSHh

Be skeptical-by-default of anyone invoking emptiness of ethics, while recognising it is some of the highest forms of ethical thinking. https://t.co/pL2FoN2oNa