Community Archive

🧡 View Thread

🧡 Thread (20 tweets)

Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago

the most interesting idea for me from Julian Jaynes so far is consciousness being a metaphor where the outside world is used as an analog to represent the workings of the mind. (Jaynes is looking more at reflective aspect of C, qualia isn't a big target for him)

13 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

"what channels of info are available to construct this model of what's 'going on' in your head?" reading old popsci books on confabulation: "it's as if we hear ourselves speak, and then use what we heard to determine what we meant" hmmmm, very Elephant in the Brain...

3 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

global neuronal workspace seems like a decent shot at the brain stuff that corresponds to "being aware of XYZ" in a given moment. it also gives a lot of leads on what you would or wouldn't expect to be accessible by conscious introspection https://t.co/qMnjPqqPno

3 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

translating Jaynes' "ancient humans weren't conscious" with this GNW: ancient humans still had a GNW, and shit would propogate through it, but there were no modules that had learned to record and track the history of what has gone through the GNW.

2 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

you get reflective consciousness ("I notice that I'm aware, 2s ago I was aware of ABC" etc) from being able to route the quoted version of stimuli that got propogated thru GNW *back into* the GNW

3 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

seems plausibly in the realm of either learned cognition or innate, so I'm not *convinced* of Jaynes yet, but this frame makes it WAAAAAAY more clear what the hypothesis might even be at all, and allows me to ask way better questions

4 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

so how might a pre-reflective-conscious (PRC) human think? brain claim: if you can observe it, and get a reward signal on it, you automatically learn how to manipulate it PRC can only observe their actions, NOT their own cognition

3 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

Jaynes' on language being needed for consciousness: hmmm, I said "sending the quoted version back into the GNW". for Reflective Awareness (RA) you've got to transform *stimulus* to "*stimulus* was just on my mind" language seems like the obv encoding mech, but not necessary?

5 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

Tying in Dennett: awareness as GNW and consciousness as a Map jives with DD's multiple drafts thing. And no Cartesian Theater! the GNW is a "theater", but it can only FEELS like one when you feed the Map back through it, and the Map is INSANELY editable https://t.co/yaKFWuH5df

Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago

Global Neuronal Workspace theory The Origins of consciousness and the breakdown of the bicameral mind (julian Jayne) Consciousness explained (Daniel Dennett) https://t.co/gBjtnX2bF6

Quoted tweet image 1
4 0
5 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

hehe, @yashkaf better start moving faster or I'll beat you to it πŸ™ƒπŸ˜ŽπŸ˜ˆπŸ† https://t.co/y19xpfGSr9

Placeholder
Jakeup@yashkafβ€’ over 5 years ago

Ol' Isaac got dibs on light and the laws of motion, so my goal for the quarantine is to figure out the hard problem of consciousness. Here's step 1. https://t.co/mFCp9IH8Bp

8 0
1 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

i've only read @fortelabs version of Theory of Constructed Emotions, but this whole shtick makes it both make sense, and help me udnerstand why Tiaog and Feldman kept sounding crazy to me... https://t.co/W7uW2tolR1

4 1
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

if emotions are a learned "subsystem" in one's Map, they "aren't real/are made up" sure, but you should still expect lots of consistency and patterns, because the process by which you create your Map still involves a lot of innate shit.

4 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

I LOVE the connection to TCE, because it adds more to "what info channels are available for constructing your map?" ALL OF YOUR NERVOUS SYSTEM!!!!! you're in a learned danger scenario. activate tension. Map making gets signal about being tense, uses this Emotion to model this

2 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

i'm WAAAy more excited for polyvagal theory. if feedback from the nervous system is a key info source through which the Map is created, lets LEARn that bitch! woooow, it's almost like you can't understand the mind without understanding the body 😱🀯🀦 https://t.co/tlejSKspHa

Placeholder
Guy HAS FINISHED WRITING THE BOOK (BETA)@nosilvervβ€’ over 5 years ago

The body has mutually exclusive nervous system states with corresponding motor strategies: Attunment (social emotion, motion, communication), or Threat (run, jump, be in conflict), orFreeze (immbolize, conserve energy, act dead). You’re always in one of them. MEMORIZE THIS. https://t.co/NCHB9E0eXk

Quoted tweet image 1
116 23
6 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Guy HAS FINISHED WRITING THE BOOK (BETA)@nosilvervβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

@natural_hazard 5 min difference. good boy, fast updating https://t.co/rWX49brfju

Tweet image 1
2 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @nosilverv

@nosilverv *flat falling joke about polyamory falls flat*

0 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

This post helps highlight the difference between Jaynes reflective-consciousness and other Type 2 thinking (which makes use of GNW/working memory (what's the difference between them?), but needn't be reflective) https://t.co/N9zrsGB3Y4

1 0
4/7/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

This gets at the heart of consciousness as a Map idea, and puts forward very concrete ideas about how to continue investigating it https://t.co/qyPmfrIa2L

Tweet image 1
3 0
4/9/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

on those "you've got no freewill!" studies a while back (brain activity predates conscious awareness of decision) this seems like the delay between "the decision has been made" (and propogated along GNW?) and "I experience awareness of the decision" (it's quoted and piped back)

2 0
4/9/2020
Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago
Replying to @natural_hazard

a thread really hammering in the difference between experiencing X and being aware of experiencing X https://t.co/Ca9QXO9mD7

Placeholder
Hazard@natural_hazardβ€’ over 5 years ago

in epistemic logic, people sometimes use the axiom "if you know A, then you know that you know A" this isn't really true when talking about humans, and i think it's this sort of mistake, but swapping "know" with "are aware of" that has fucked a lot of thinking on consciousness

9 0
1 0
4/9/2020