🧵 View Thread
🧵 Thread (16 tweets)

there's this very annoying thing that disagreeable people do where they respond to something with "this is incorrect" and then elaborate by giving you another statement that does not in any way refute the original statement; ie A and B can both be true https://t.co/EI3zkLWOA4


Like, actually, Chris hasn't even said anything yet. All he's said is "I'm going to write an essay about X" and the person replies with "that is incorrect" – ??? how do you even know? how can you refute an argument you haven't read

the song that never ends https://t.co/3LVyIatB0G

@visakanv Like, if you expect you know more about the subject than the person whose argument is about to be made, and you think their conclusion is wrong, you can so no, you're wrong. Generally a bad idea unless somebody's trying to make a perpetual motion machine or something though.

@imhinesmi yeah but Chris wasn't saying "AOC is the first Extremely Online politician and this is the #1 reason why she's winning", he just said "AOC is the first Extremely Online politician", which by itself is basically correct